Right.. What exactly do i need for Turbo Conversion...

Chat about MG-Rovers, MG-Rover ownership and anything MGs or Rovers in general.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

southside
RT GOD
Posts: 7682
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 3:50 pm
feedback: 341327
Location: Tamworth
Contact:

Right.. What exactly do i need for Turbo Conversion...

Post by southside »

Can anyone give me a complete list? Looks like i'll be using a vittesse engine and box as i cant find a coupe engine in my price range so i kno i'll need the following,

220 Turbo engine wiring loom,

200 Turbo ECU and 5as unit,

Engine backplate (any have a pic of this as im not sure what it is?)

Radiator and twin fans

Intercooler? (can i use one from 800?)

220 Subframes

220 Turbo downpipe

220 Turbo sump

Is there anything else i've missed? Its going in a 1.6 k-series cabriolet
Image
Image
MarkCoupe
Bronze Trader
Bronze Trader
Posts: 18062
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:12 pm
feedback: 195147
Location: Newmarket
Contact:

Post by MarkCoupe »

The plate , adaptor plate is whats bolted to the block, the gearbox mounts to it.
Image
Sum carz
Si
RT GOD
Posts: 8689
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Midlands + Reading

Re: Right.. What exactly do i need for Turbo Conversion...

Post by Si »

southside wrote:Engine backplate (any have a pic of this as im not sure what it is?)

Radiator

220 Subframes

220 Turbo sump


Ive got all them, just need to check on the sump. :)
Image
Rover sold, now S2000. 259.9hp + 9,200rpm :D
Car Spec
258Bhp, 249lb/ft
Bubble Turbo
Forum Senior
Posts: 275
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:45 am

Post by Bubble Turbo »

iirc sean it will be front subframe only, 220 t16 mounts, vitesse gearbox will be hydraulic and need changing to cable, u cant use the 800 IC and yor missing drive shafts off yor list
rover400turbo
RT GOD
Posts: 3142
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 11:48 pm
feedback: 1058012

Post by rover400turbo »

Chassis and body welding, It will twist itsself apart in a very short time.

Its a Rag top, 30% less stiffness, mine has suffered from chassis twist n the form of breaking the windscreen sealing.
Si
RT GOD
Posts: 8689
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Midlands + Reading

Post by Si »

The coupe is hardly a stiff car though.

Is the rear subframe the same on the 1.6K then?

Oh I have some shafts too :)
Image
Rover sold, now S2000. 259.9hp + 9,200rpm :D
Car Spec
258Bhp, 249lb/ft
southside
RT GOD
Posts: 7682
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 3:50 pm
feedback: 341327
Location: Tamworth
Contact:

Post by southside »

rover400turbo wrote:Chassis and body welding, It will twist itsself apart in a very short time.

Its a Rag top, 30% less stiffness, mine has suffered from chassis twist n the form of breaking the windscreen sealing.


Hmm thats stange my mates had a turbo in his for around 2 years and no problems what so ever. he takes it to pod and everything and its only standard chassis. I would of said they were stronger than coupes due to extra strengthening in the sills
Image
Image
Si
RT GOD
Posts: 8689
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Midlands + Reading

Post by Si »

I would agree too, the coupe as stiff as a paper bag. Your not going to be running the power of a Rover 400 either. A car thats biggest engine was a 140bhp T16 and that has no front engine mount.

Ps my inbox isnt full now
Image
Rover sold, now S2000. 259.9hp + 9,200rpm :D
Car Spec
258Bhp, 249lb/ft
Sheaf
RT GOD
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 10:03 am
feedback: 332244

Post by Sheaf »

I remember Mark saying on here that his cab is a lot stiffer than his coupe was. Jack it up and it doesn't twist, while the coupe did.
1999 Honda Accord Type R - 2157cc of VTEC 4dr fun :vtec:
2011 Mazda 6 Sport 2.2 Diesel - For the days I want torque and economy
Si
RT GOD
Posts: 8689
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Midlands + Reading

Post by Si »

Sheaf wrote:I remember Mark saying on here that his cab is a lot stiffer than his coupe was. Jack it up and it doesn't twist, while the coupe did.


The coupe doesnt even lift up, it kind of moulds around the jack :P
Image
Rover sold, now S2000. 259.9hp + 9,200rpm :D
Car Spec
258Bhp, 249lb/ft
Sheaf
RT GOD
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 10:03 am
feedback: 332244

Post by Sheaf »

I does if you use the sill instead of the jacking points... (I've seen it done to another car, despite my objection :cry: )
1999 Honda Accord Type R - 2157cc of VTEC 4dr fun :vtec:
2011 Mazda 6 Sport 2.2 Diesel - For the days I want torque and economy
southside
RT GOD
Posts: 7682
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 3:50 pm
feedback: 341327
Location: Tamworth
Contact:

Post by southside »

Can anyone confirm about the subframes? will i need engine mounts aswell or are the 800 ones the same? i can get 800 turbo engines and box for £150. you rekon thats worth it or should i wait and just get one from a coupe?
Image
Image
bruce_xtreme
Newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:35 pm
Location: Midlands
Contact:

Re: Right.. What exactly do i need for Turbo Conversion...

Post by bruce_xtreme »

I've got
220 Turbo engine wiring loom, 220 Subframe, driveshafts, hubs, suspension, front anti roll bar!

Bruce
Si
RT GOD
Posts: 8689
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Midlands + Reading

Post by Si »

southside wrote:Can anyone confirm about the subframes? will i need engine mounts aswell or are the 800 ones the same? i can get 800 turbo engines and box for £150. you rekon thats worth it or should i wait and just get one from a coupe?


You need mounts and also the cambelt mount that bolts to the block is different, again I have the metal 200 engine mount that bolts to the block too.

Your gonna have to come over and see what I have one day :)
Image
Rover sold, now S2000. 259.9hp + 9,200rpm :D
Car Spec
258Bhp, 249lb/ft
mach1rob
RT GOD
Posts: 19480
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 9:48 pm
feedback: 194308
Contact:

Post by mach1rob »

You WILL need both subframes, I've had to change both on the Tourer (1.6K originally) Oh and here's a very handy hint! Have a look at the bulkhaed, see if there's a metal bar running across it with brake pipes clipped to it, if there is, remove it BEFORE trying to fit 220 subframe :wink: Yes it gets in the way, the rear mount fouls it which you can't see while your underneath scratching your head as to why it don't fit :roll:
Image
BlueRover
RT GOD
Posts: 7702
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 11:17 pm
feedback: 490660
Location: At the bridge, with Horatius.
Contact:

Post by BlueRover »

I am slowly getting the impression that it's an awful lot of work. Why not get a N2O system on it for the occasional times you need extra whizz.
Image

Stella now gone, Ruby is my baby now.
For your photography needs, try
http://www.freelancephotographic.net
216si
RT GOD
Posts: 5510
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:15 am
feedback: 426245
Location: washington

Post by 216si »

the conversion is a doddle to do, just time consuming and fun imo :D:D:D

starting mine on friday when i get in from work and i can't wait :D:D:D


oh mate if si can't help you out i have a spare rear engine plate from a 220 :).
Home grown mk3 turbo....
Image
My Vouch thread CLICK HERE
gaz200
Forum Senior
Posts: 477
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:28 pm
feedback: 628429

Post by gaz200 »

rover400turbo wrote:Chassis and body welding, It will twist itsself apart in a very short time.

Its a Rag top, 30% less stiffness, mine has suffered from chassis twist n the form of breaking the windscreen sealing.


Like i said in your other thread http://www.rovertech.net/forum/viewtopi ... c&start=25 might be worth looking at some sort of strengthening? or at least a strut brace i would have thought that the cabs would have been stronger too due to no roof, unless rover400turbos' and my mates cabs were already bent??
mach1rob
RT GOD
Posts: 19480
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 9:48 pm
feedback: 194308
Contact:

Post by mach1rob »

BlueRover wrote:I am slowly getting the impression that it's an awful lot of work. Why not get a N2O system on it for the occasional times you need extra whizz.


Well it's not an afternoons work put it that way, BUT it's fun doing it :D Yes nos would be a quick way to get a few more bhp, but then again that's going to cost roughly the same if not more in the long run :wink: Plus what happens when you want that extra grunt only to realise your bottles empty? :P
Image
Leo
Return of the K777
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 9:21 pm
feedback: 1118482
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands

Post by Leo »

mach1rob wrote:what happens when you want that extra grunt only to realise your bottles empty? :P

You retire into the would-have-been victim's rear view mirror very sheepishly, and with a red face! :oops:
91 Citroen BX GTi 8v - bought March 13
95 Ford Mondeo 1.8i Ghia - March 11 - March 13 - scrapped
98 620 SLDi - July 08 - March 11
97 420 GSDi - dumped in France
94 420 GSi Turbo, 235bhp. Dec 03 - May 08, still missed
93 214 Si - June 02 - Feb 04
Post Reply

Return to “MG/Rover Chat”